Juan SUN_Professionals_Hylands Law Firm

Juan SUNPartner

Nanjing Office: Language：Chinese English; Expertise： Corporate; Tel：86 135 1250 3464; Email：sunjuan@hylandslaw.com

Basic Profile

Professional Background

Lawyer sun Juan is well versed in the laws and operations of financial securities and corporate business, is good at accurately using laws and regulations, and can accurately grasp policy trends. Over the years, he has accumulated rich practical experience in civil and commercial non litigation and litigation business in dealing with major contract, equity and asset disputes. He has provided legal services for nearly 100 well-known enterprises in bond issuance, financing, restructuring, listing and mergers and acquisitions, and has been highly praised by customers.

Social Activities

Honors and Awards

Representative Cases

Corporate business
Banking and Finance

Served as the legal adviser of the listed company Jiangsu Bicon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (002411), providing the company with legal services such as major restructuring, equity mergers and acquisitions, equity financing, etc., participating in the whole process of negotiation, drafting and signing investment contracts, and providing legal advice for the company's decision-making.
It provided legal services for the listed company Tongding Internet (002491) and conducted due diligence on the proposed investment object, in which the invested cloud creation storage has been successfully listed.
As the legal adviser of a joint-stock company in Nanjing, he participated in the special legal services of Shanghai Lianchuang Investment Management Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Yongxuan Venture Capital Management Co., Ltd. for their venture capital, and now provides special legal services for their corporate governance, joint-stock reform and listing.
In the dispute of returning goods on behalf of an enterprise, the case involved international trade and letters of credit, and the legal relationship was complex. The case went through the first instance, the second instance, and the retrial of the Supreme Court. After the retrial, the first instance decided that an enterprise should compensate nearly 80million yuan. We intervened in the second instance after the retrial. We found major facts that had not been identified in the previous trial, and the second instance changed the judgment, and an enterprise recovered nearly 40million yuan of losses.
Acting for Zhangjiagang xintianhong Copper Industry Co., Ltd., China national investment high tech Industrial Investment Co., Ltd. and Guo, Zhou and other cases of recourse disputes, after the first instance, the second instance and the retrial of the Supreme Court, successfully avoided losses of more than 200million yuan for the parties.
A large shipbuilding enterprise is facing bankruptcy because the debtor applied to the court for bankruptcy. Through the legal and financial due diligence of the enterprise, it is found that all the funds of the enterprise are deposited on the six ships that have been built and are about to be built. As long as there is a certain amount of working capital, the enterprise can rise from the dead and come back to life; Moreover, the large amount of equipment invested by the enterprise is in the leading position in the same industry, and once it goes bankrupt, the ships and a large amount of equipment to be built will be a pile of scrap iron. Therefore, we submitted a reorganization report to the court, suggesting that the enterprise carry out bankruptcy reorganization, and the court made a decision on bankruptcy reorganization.
Acting as an agent for a real estate Co., Ltd. in a dispute case with its contractor for the project payment of 50million yuan, actively collecting relevant evidence, carefully studying and judging the case, and finally paying the project payment of more than 30million yuan, avoiding the loss of nearly 20million yuan.
In the case of requesting the employer to pay the additional project payment on behalf of a construction engineering company, due to the agreement of both parties on the arbitration award, after careful study of the procedural law such as the procedural law and the relevant case, the court brought a new lawsuit to the court and applied for the project audit. The court ruled that the incremental project payment should be paid, which saved the losses for the parties.